On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:26:26 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:19 AM, David Paleino > <da...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:09:22 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > >> Why is a route relation needed to group the segments of a street? > > > > I'm using that because I consider "Foo Avenue" as a logical unit, a > > "route", even if the way is split (because of oneways, different > > classifications, different tags, whatever). > > But why does this "logical unit" need to be grouped in a relation? I > don't see any benefit to it.
The benefit is intrinsic in data organization. -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
