On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:00 AM, David Paleino <da...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:42:12 +0200, Simone Saviolo wrote: > >> 2010/9/1 David Paleino <da...@debian.org>: >> > In fact, we already have a relation for grouping a street together (various >> > segments + "links"). That's Relation:route, with route=road. What about a >> > "house" role to include housenumbers there? >> >> I'm not sure if you're suggesting we use the proposed relation Street >> (that already has a "house" role) or the approved relation Route. > > I'm proposing the use of the already well-established Route.
Why is a route relation needed to group the segments of a street? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
