On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:35 AM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29 August 2010 16:28, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> To me pavilions have walls, is this another cultural issue? >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Z%C3%BCrich_-_B%C3%BCrkliplatz_IMG_0525_ShiftN.jpg >> (or something less fancy) is what I think of a pavilion as. >> http://apps.ocfl.net/dept/cesrvcs/parks/parkdetails.asp?parkid=66 >> agrees that the park has "rental pavilions" (second icon in the >> amenity list). > > We can sit here all day and trade links to wiki pages and images that > agree with our point of view, which is why I made the comment about > being a cultural thing: > > http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/goyder-pavilion-to-open-at-showground/story-e6frea83-1111117228620
Yes, pavilions can have walls. But do they usually? Do you have a better suggestion for what I and the park department call a pavilion? > >> It seems to be the same difference between natural=wood and >> landuse=forest. In one case they left the old natural trees, while in >> the other they planted new trees (usually palm trees around here). If >> you have a bench next to a tree, the former is likely to provide more >> shade. > > You asked about trees suitable for climbing, not about shade trees, > you can always tag the species if you just care to distinguish between > species. I asked about old gnarly trees, which will generally provide more shade. A newly-planted tree of the same species won't. Do you have a useful suggestion? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
