On 29 August 2010 16:28, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would think the actual location of the spots would be important, > especially when there's a point of interest at each end of the parking > lot.
You might want to ask on the accessibility mailing list... >> To me pavilions have walls, is this another cultural issue? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Z%C3%BCrich_-_B%C3%BCrkliplatz_IMG_0525_ShiftN.jpg > (or something less fancy) is what I think of a pavilion as. > http://apps.ocfl.net/dept/cesrvcs/parks/parkdetails.asp?parkid=66 > agrees that the park has "rental pavilions" (second icon in the > amenity list). We can sit here all day and trade links to wiki pages and images that agree with our point of view, which is why I made the comment about being a cultural thing: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/goyder-pavilion-to-open-at-showground/story-e6frea83-1111117228620 > It seems to be the same difference between natural=wood and > landuse=forest. In one case they left the old natural trees, while in > the other they planted new trees (usually palm trees around here). If > you have a bench next to a tree, the former is likely to provide more > shade. You asked about trees suitable for climbing, not about shade trees, you can always tag the species if you just care to distinguish between species. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
