On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/8/23 Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>: >> Hell no. That would be a parking lane, not suitable for cycling. >> Picture a typical bike lane; now remove all signage and markings >> calling it a bike lane. Here's an example: >> http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=28.332798,-81.491435&spn=0.001929,0.00515&t=k&z=19&layer=c&cbll=28.332797,-81.491264&panoid=s34bEpDWqe-ThdTF0X38uQ&cbp=12,103.59,,0,2.84 > > what does actually make you believe it is intended for bicycles if > there is no signs and no road markings? Couldn't it just as well be > for horses, skateboards, pedestrians, snow mobiles, motorbikes, dogs > or whatever?
The way the solid line becomes dashed at the beginning of the right turn lane, with a solid line on each side of the narrow strip approaching the intersection, is standard bike lane design in Florida and one of several recommended by the feds: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/pedbike/05085/chapt15.cfm#fig1511 _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
