On 31/07/2010 00:46, Stephen Hope wrote:
On 31 July 2010 09:29, Dave F.<dave...@madasafish.com> wrote:
I just don't see an ambulance/fire station as an emergency. I mean, if you
fall down and injure yourself you don't try& get to the station you 'phone
up& get an ambulance to come to you.
Where I live it is common to talk about the emergency services. We
even see it on road signs - things like "no turning except emergency
vehicles". That means fire, police, ambulance, SES (State Emergency
Services), etc. Usually each service has it's own locations, but not
far from me there's an area which has ambulances, fire engines and a
helicopter based - and it's called the "something emergency centre"
(can't remember who they called it after).
Tagging places where emergency services are based with an emergency
tag is not strange.
I see them as amenities& will continue to tag them as such. It's seems
wrong to have fire as amenity& ambulance as emergency.
I agree- fire stations should be in the emergency tag as well :)
These are pointless amendments. Whatever the key is it will still be
rendered & labelled as a fire/ambulance station. You lot are just
wasting your time. arguing the toss.
If it ain't broke...
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
