Hi!
Am 06.01.2010 07:15, schrieb Steve Bennett:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net
> The asymmetry arises from the requirements of the modes of transport:
> anything that a bike can ride on, a pedestrian can walk on - but not
> vice versa.
>
> Anyway, with the realisation that cycleway is actually treated the same
> as highway=path,bicycle=designated (I thought this was just a proposal,
> I didn't realise it actually worked), everything gets simpler.
No it does not. This equality was originally intended in the path
proposal, but there is also a large fraction of mappers who use it
differently. Their argumentation is like this:
- "designated" means there is a sign
- in my country, when there is a sign, the way is exclusive for cycles
- cycleway means pedestrains are allowed, but if there is a sign, they
are not, so it cannot be the same
bye
Nop
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
