On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > and the poor Austrians, Swiss, Turkish > and the poor Belarus, Belgians, Brazilians, French, Dutch if it is not > also designated for pedestrians or an alternative for pedestrians > exists. > > Please stop considering OSM as a UK, Germany and more recently US and > Australia centric project even if the activity of this list might give > this impression. > > I think "Germany" in this case has been used as a convenient placeholder for "countries with cycleways like they have in Germany". But your point is well made, and I apologise, as one of the guilty parties.
> Look this (old) wiki page about this (old) topic: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions > > Is it "old" as in, obsolete? Should we make an Australian entry, or is it no longer relevant? Steve
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
