On 01/06/2010 07:10 AM, Nop wrote: > > No it does not. This equality was originally intended in the path > proposal, but there is also a large fraction of mappers who use it > differently. Their argumentation is like this: > - "designated" means there is a sign > - in my country, when there is a sign, the way is exclusive for cycles > - cycleway means pedestrains are allowed, but if there is a sign, they > are not, so it cannot be the same
So they should use access=no in addition to bicycle=designated. Seems simple enough to me. This is also why access=official was created, even though it’s redundant. -Alex Mauer “hawke”
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
