On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Richard Mann < > richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Steve - dip your toe in the Smoothness debate on the wiki, and recoil with >> horror that people have devoted so much time to arguing over suitability >> measures. >> > > Heh, I've only seen the results of it so far. How on earth did they come up > with "very horrible"? :) The best thing is, the photos of "very horrible" > look "very mild" to me, compared to some of the really bad surfaces out > there. > And that's what happens when you try to map suitability. As I've said before, I have absolutely no idea how suitable a particular way is for bicycling. I can usually tell you the surface, though, and let you (or a computer algorithm) decide based on that.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
