On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Richard Mann < richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Steve - dip your toe in the Smoothness debate on the wiki, and recoil with > horror that people have devoted so much time to arguing over suitability > measures. > Heh, I've only seen the results of it so far. How on earth did they come up with "very horrible"? :) The best thing is, the photos of "very horrible" look "very mild" to me, compared to some of the really bad surfaces out there. > You can get a basic classification of physical attributes using the highway > tag (especially when you know that 99% of the use of "path" is for unpaved > footways). Something like bicycle:defacto probably allows you to record > informal access, if the bicycle (legal) tag is insufficient. > Is "bicycle:defacto=*" even required? Wouldn't "bicycle=defacto" work? I guess the only thing you're losing is the ability to say "bicycles are definitely prohibited, but ridden anyway". Steve
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging