On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Steve Bennett <stevag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hence, if "you can see" a 2m wide concrete path, but no signage and >> have no "non-copyright information on legal status", highway=path + >> surface=concrete + width=2 is exactly what you should tag. If it has >> "tyre-tracks", feel free to add tyre_tracks=visible. >> > > The problem with that very naive approach is that the problem then becomes > the router/renderer's. Should a router send a bicycle down that path or not? > The person best placed to make that call is the one who has surveyed it.
I strongly disagree. The surveyor must only tag information that is verifiable. They should NOT tag "I_think_the_router_should_send_bikes_down_here=yes". Notice the "I_think" - that means it isn't verifiable. In other words, the person "best placed" to set the criteria for what they want to ride on is *the user*. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
