On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> you're suggesting how to tag that a path is "commonly >> used" by bicycles - there isn't a tag for that! > > > I'm only about a year into trying to find a decent answer to this question > (how to tag informal bike paths). I know there isn't a tag for it.
Sure, but you said "The problem is not verifiability, it's how you record what you can see." In *Australia*, the problem with bicycle=yes/no (i.e. tagging *legal* status) is indeed verifiability. Hence, if "you can see" a 2m wide concrete path, but no signage and have no "non-copyright information on legal status", highway=path + surface=concrete + width=2 is exactly what you should tag. If it has "tyre-tracks", feel free to add tyre_tracks=visible. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
