Ok, but backing to the first point. It is clear that in most, if not all places bycicle=no means that you cannot ride, but you can push unmounted. How about places that you cannot have a bike at all (such as inside of a shopping mall for instance)?
Cheers 2009/12/3 Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:00 PM, James Livingston <doc...@mac.com> wrote: > >> So there is a distinction, but it can probably be achieved by using > bicycle=no for situations where riding is not allowed, and > access=private+foot=permissive for situations where bicycles aren't allowed. > > > > That sounds reasonable to me. If everyone like that, is it worth putting > on the 'access' wiki page as an example for how to tag something not > completely obvious? > > > > I don't understand what access=private is doing here. "private" is > about the owner and the public access or not, it has nothing to do > with pedestrians or bikers. > Definition on the wiki: > access=private The owner may give permission on an individual basis. > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Arlindo Saraiva Pereira Jr. Bacharelando em Sistemas de Informação - UNIRIO - uniriotec.br Consultor de Software Livre da Uniriotec Consultoria - uniriotec.com Acadêmico: arlindo.pere...@uniriotec.br Profissional: arlindo.pere...@uniriotec.com Geral: cont...@arlindopereira.com Tel.: +5521 92504072 Jabber/Google Talk: nig...@nighto.net Skype: nighto_sumomo Chave pública: BD065DEC
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
