Hi Anton, I was hoping that others might express their opinions about this.
SPEC 0 seems fine to me. Oscar On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 13:35, Anton Akhmerov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you Oscar for taking action. Does that mean that sympy can endorse > spec-0? Or that will it do so starting from some version? > > Anton > > On Wednesday 5 June 2024 at 21:13:21 UTC+2 Oscar wrote: >> >> On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 21:10, Oscar Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Personally I am in favour of going with SPEC 0 in coordination with >> > the rest of the scientific Python ecosystem. I don't want to cause any >> > immediate problems for Sage though so I would be reluctant to make a >> > last minute decision to drop two Python versions right now for 1.13. >> >> I followed this up on the Sage mailing list: >> https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/0BPkiiWYrIU/m/9c2asTEaEwAJ?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer >> >> That suggests that Sage has no need for SymPy 1.13 to support Python >> 3.8 which would have been dropped 18 months ago if following SPEC 0. >> It also suggests that after 1.13 is released it would be fine from >> Sage's perspective for SymPy to drop support for both 3.8 and 3.9 but >> perhaps not drop 3.10 according to the SPEC 0 schedule (which would be >> in a few months time so SymPy 1.14). >> >> -- >> Oscar > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/be468354-70b2-4f2b-8269-e0a8fbeaaeb8n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/CAHVvXxT_9hX4QZi2Xa-D0HygFY%3DSKmBY4-heLuOzuNya00Bj9g%40mail.gmail.com.
