Thank you Oscar for taking action. Does that mean that sympy can endorse spec-0? Or that will it do so starting from some version?
Anton On Wednesday 5 June 2024 at 21:13:21 UTC+2 Oscar wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 at 21:10, Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Personally I am in favour of going with SPEC 0 in coordination with > > the rest of the scientific Python ecosystem. I don't want to cause any > > immediate problems for Sage though so I would be reluctant to make a > > last minute decision to drop two Python versions right now for 1.13. > > I followed this up on the Sage mailing list: > > https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/0BPkiiWYrIU/m/9c2asTEaEwAJ?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer > > That suggests that Sage has no need for SymPy 1.13 to support Python > 3.8 which would have been dropped 18 months ago if following SPEC 0. > It also suggests that after 1.13 is released it would be fine from > Sage's perspective for SymPy to drop support for both 3.8 and 3.9 but > perhaps not drop 3.10 according to the SPEC 0 schedule (which would be > in a few months time so SymPy 1.14). > > -- > Oscar > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/be468354-70b2-4f2b-8269-e0a8fbeaaeb8n%40googlegroups.com.
