Le 06/01/2018 à 20:13, Troy A. Griffitts a écrit : > > These v11ns are not in the sources because we are still researching. > But since these have been double checked to printed editions, >
I have the printing edition!! And this report is about the printing edition, not about the doc file. But the doc file correspond exactly to the printing edition. > > I highly doubt whatever 'errors' you see are actually errors in the > v11n, but rather a bad source text. I am sorry for speculating, but I > know these v11ns were checked and verified by a second individual > against a printed edition and also know there is a ton of low quality > texts online which claim to be things which they are not. > The check was not good done. > > These are simply my suspicions without having the time now to put in > the research. I hope you find a way to check and confirm. > Then I can confirm this : The current canon_LXX.h and the LXX,rahlfs.h don't match with the printing edition, I have with me. > > Troy > > > > On 01/06/2018 12:06 PM, Cyrille wrote: >> >> >> Le 06/01/2018 à 18:36, Troy A. Griffitts a écrit : >>> >>> Dear Cyrille, >>> >>> I just did a brief diff between the canon_lxx.h and the >>> canon_lxx-super.h I sent you in my previous email, and the >>> differences don't look like anything useful. I must be mistaken >>> about what this file is. Have a read of the comments in the file I >>> send and those in the canon_lxx.h included in 1.8.0. They are very >>> similar, but the *-super.h v11n includes this comment near the end >>> of the header: >>> >>> "This is not intended for critical editions that separately encode >>> variant traditions of Joshua, Judges, Tobit, etc. that are already >>> served by the Rahlfs versification system (q.v.)." >>> >>> I am not sure to what the "Rahlfs versification system (q.v.)" >>> refers, nor the /quod vide/ at the end of the reference. >>> >>> I could possibly refer to the analysis of Rahlfs in the LXX v11n >>> folder I send to you earlier, specifically here, but I am not sure: >>> >>> http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/canon_rahlfs.h >>> >> My question is why this v11n are not in the sources? And I compare >> the Rahlfs.h, it's not good... still a lot of issues. I ready to >> perform it. Please let me know the good way to help. >> But it clear for me that for the current source I have, it's not >> possible to use the current LXX v11n. >>> >>> But I do not see any accommodation for alternate traditions in >>> there. I may need to go search old emails to dig up the discussions >>> on this. >>> >>> Troy >>> >>> >>> >>> On 01/06/2018 09:36 AM, Cyrille wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 06/01/2018 à 17:16, Troy A. Griffitts a écrit : >>>>> Hi Cyrille, >>>>> >>>>> Just a few comments which I hope will clear up a few things. >>>>> >>>>> The sword-tools SVN repo needs to be checked out to your computer >>>>> before you can run the convert.sh for CCAT. The repo contains the >>>>> .jar file you asked about. You cannot just download the individual >>>>> convert.sh script. >>>> >>>> Ok It's clear. I need to clone it with hg? The user is this from >>>> the automatic email send? If it is this email I can't find it again :-\ >>>>> >>>>> SWORD versifications are often a superset for multiple Bibles. The >>>>> SWORD engine provides a facility for frontends to easily skip >>>>> empty entries. Thus, when you discover that a chapter here or a >>>>> chapter there has too many verses, it is probably that way to >>>>> support another Bible which has more verses for that chapter. >>>>> >>>>> LXX v11n has been researched extensively by Chris and others. >>>>> There are many issues regarding the LXX which are not easily >>>>> resolved, e.g., Rahlfs providing two textual traditions of the >>>>> same book in parallel with different versifications. I h research >>>>> for LXX in general can be found here: >>>>> >>>>> http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/ >>>> >>>> OK but what to do?? Is it possible to use the Rahlfs with osis2mod? >>>> Because Rahlfs is not the current one. I have the Rahlfs text. If I >>>> use the current LXX v11n with my text I will have really a lot of >>>> issues! >>>>> >>>>> Hope this helps a bit. >>>>> >>>>> Troy >>>>> >>>>> On January 6, 2018 9:01:01 AM MST, Cyrille <lafricai...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> Before to work on a new module for the LXX, I decided to verify the >>>>> current LXX v11n. And what was my surprise discovering many errors! >>>>> Please can you give me the list of the current modules using LXX v11n? >>>>> I will propose a new with correction, some books give me worries, like >>>>> Esther, which contains a versification in letter, I will make you a >>>>> proposal once my verification is finished. I work with the A. Rahlfs >>>>> (maybe the current LXX v11n was made with an other ?) >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, Br Cyrille >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >>>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>>>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
