I was previously aware of multiple untagged references in \r's but not \x's, but I do see it in the manual. It seems poor markup to include multiple references per \xt tag. USFM does support multiple \xt tags per \x ... \x* tag.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Peter von Kaehne <ref...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 14:44 -0500, Michael H wrote: > > > > I haven't worked on it myself, > > And I think this is the problem. > > Xrefs can take any number of complicated forms. lists, ranges, etc. > They are context dependent - sometimes the xref is only to a verse or a > chapter/verse combo. Without understanding of the meaning of the > separators you are often lost. > > Mark 1,2;3 could mean second and third verse of chapter 1 of Mark, it > could mean second verse of chapter 1 of Mark and verse 3 of the current > chapter, it could mean first and second chapter of Mark, and verse 3 of > the current chapter and a whole plethora of other potential readings - > all dependent on what is meant by , and ;. > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
