On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Peter Wemm <pe...@wemm.org> wrote: [..] > I still want svnup to be finished and imported. Just like when we > had cvs and csup, they're targeted at different people.
One clarification. svnlite is intended to be a lighter weight alternative to the devel/subversion port, not to eliminate the port. Things like svn.freebsd.org and the mirrors could never use "svnlite" and will always run the port because they need the py-subversion API library or the apache DAV plugins. That isn't something I could ever imagine making its way into svnlite - it wasn't the point. For what its worth, the freebsd.org cluster has been mostly running svn-1.8.x for over a week, including svn.freebsd.org and all but one mirror. -- Peter Wemm - pe...@wemm.org; pe...@freebsd.org; pe...@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
