On Thu, 21 May 2009, John Baldwin wrote:

  Move the M_WAITOK flag in notify() into an M_NOWAIT one in order to
match
  the behaviour alredy present with the further malloc() call in
  devctl_notify().
  This fixes a bug in the CAM layer where the camisr handler finished to
  call camperiphfree() (and subsequently destroy_dev() resulting in a new
  dev notify) while the xpt lock is held.
This is wrong. You cannot call destroy_dev() while holding any mutex. Taking this into account, it makes no sense to use M_NOWAIT in notify().

As long as devctl_notify() also calls M_NOWAIT and if not available skips "silently" it just does the same thing, I think this approach is more consistent.

It remains, though, the fact to fix CAM when calling destroy_dev(). Maybe we should add a witness_warn() there?

I agree with kib, this should be reverted and CAM fixed instead. I also agree that M_NOWAIT use should be limited where possible.

devctl_notify() probably needs to grow a sleepable flag, or perhaps we need two variations, one that can sleep.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to