On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 09:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > I agree with kib, this should be reverted and CAM fixed instead.
I haven't sent out an updated 8.0-REL status report yet (soon...) but
one of the people who contributed status information when I sent out the
last one was Scott Long saying he hoped to get some major CAM work done
before we started to lockdown for 8.0. I didn't see him listed as
having reviewed this to begin with so I'd like to request now that he be
given the chance to at least glance at any CAM related stuff to see if
his plans would impact what you're working on. I'll try to get an
updated status report out soon so it's easier to see who is planning to
work on what - once that's updated please take that into account and
check with people who seem to be working on the same subsystems as you
to see if they have plans that overlap what you're looking at.
Thanks.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensm...@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
