Ken Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 09:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
I agree with kib, this should be reverted and CAM fixed instead.
I haven't sent out an updated 8.0-REL status report yet (soon...) but
one of the people who contributed status information when I sent out the
last one was Scott Long saying he hoped to get some major CAM work done
before we started to lockdown for 8.0. I didn't see him listed as
having reviewed this to begin with so I'd like to request now that he be
given the chance to at least glance at any CAM related stuff to see if
his plans would impact what you're working on. I'll try to get an
updated status report out soon so it's easier to see who is planning to
work on what - once that's updated please take that into account and
check with people who seem to be working on the same subsystems as you
to see if they have plans that overlap what you're looking at.
Thanks.
Yes, please extend me the courtesy of notifying me before anything
significant is changed. I don't want to hold up good progress, though,
so if I don't respond within a day or two, assume implicit approval.
As John found out, CAM is very much event driven, so EXTREME care should
be taken before changing event paths, and EXCEPTIONAL testing should be
done before committing.
Scott
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
