Hi Len Have you tried it with first order? I would of thought using one Harpexed octomic to synthesise all the spaced mics, would be a bit blurry, did you try with two?
Steve On Wed, 21 Oct 2020, 17:12 moskowitz, <lenmoskow...@optonline.net> wrote: > > Only four Core Sound OctoMic second-order microphones are needed replace > the 12 mono microphones used in full sphere ORTF-3D, with better polar > patterns and true ORTF angles & spacings for all pairs of mics. > > You'd need 32 recording channels. That can be done at reasonable cost with > a Midas 32C/DL32 setup (for under $3000), four Zoom F8ns, or for higher > cost with two Sound Devices Scorpios. > > We tried using Harpex to do ORTF with a single OctoMic. Unfortunately, its > plane wave decomposition process for translating ambisonic soundfields in > space results in relatively weak location cues. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20201021/f2ce4909/attachment.htm> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
