Spatial audio is as doused snakeoil as the hifi world. Sound localisation is not a purely subjective affair - have there been any listening tests which demosntrate binaural rendering is capable of creating anything like headphone spatialisation over two stereo loudspeakers ? I highly doubt it.Anyway -- perhaps one of these "modern" inaural recording are available online and we can judge for ourselves. I have neve rnotices any problems rendering ambisonics or vbap with dozens of channels - or even WFS . What do you mean by "you cant record audio objects" ?
On 9 January 2017 at 01:05, Stefan Schreiber <st...@mail.telepac.pt> wrote: > Augustine Leudar wrote: > > <> modern binaural recordings I've heard on speakers did not give excellent >> results they gave terrible results, aside from the fact the transfer >> functions are messed up by room reflections and cross talk >> > > Fair enough. But it seems that opinions about this seem to be vastly > different. (The quality of binaural recordings represented via loudspeakers > is judged to be about between "terrible" and "excellent", depending on > listener....) > > it doesn't even >> work perfectly on headphones due to differences in individual hrtfs. >> >> > No, quite obviously not "perfectly". Listening results will depend a lot > on the hrtf mismatch between dummy head and (individual) listener. And the > perspective is fixed - you can't rotate some dummy head recording! > > Transaural is supposed to be the the two speaker equivelant of binaural for >> speakers I know spat were due to release a new version that worked - >> anyone >> heard it ? >> > Ambiophonics could also be used - as some already established form of > X-talk cancellation. > > Stefan I am curious what are the advantages you see of >> ambisonics for 360 audio over say vbap aside from upmix downmix >> capability ? >> >> > 1. You can't record audio objects. 2. You could reduce computational > complexity? > > You didn't specify any application details. (So I assume you referred to > music recordings or VR.) > Best regards, > > Stefan > > > > On Sunday, 8 January 2017, Bob Burton <b...@audiorents.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> 1997 "The year had started and finished with Mike (Oldfield) >>> collaborating >>> with David Bedford. To finish the year Mike played on the title track on >>> Bedford's 5th studio LPInstructions for Angels (V2090). Surprisingly, the >>> track on which Mike appeared was recorded live at Worcester Cathedral on >>> the Rolling Stones mobile recording studio. This track is quite >>> breathtaking, with Bedford playing the cathedrals organ and Mike playing >>> guitar, the natural acoustics of the cathedral make it sound quite >>> awesome. >>> Finally, the complete LP was mixed at Mike's Througham studio in BBC >>> Matrix >>> H Quad which was also stereo compatible." >>> >>> https://youtu.be/hRIadP2XMgc >>> -------------- next part -------------- >>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >>> URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/ >>> attachments/20170107/65d28b1e/attachment.html> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- Augustine Leudar Artistic Director Magik Door LTD Company Number : NI635217 Registered 63 Ballycoan rd, Belfast BT88LL -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20170109/d471d95b/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
