Spatial audio is as doused  snakeoil as the hifi world. Sound localisation
is not a purely subjective affair - have there been any listening tests
which demosntrate binaural rendering is capable of creating anything like
headphone spatialisation over two stereo loudspeakers ? I highly doubt
it.Anyway -- perhaps one of these "modern" inaural recording are available
online and we can judge for ourselves.
I have neve rnotices any problems rendering ambisonics or vbap with dozens
of channels - or even WFS .  What do you mean by "you cant record audio
objects" ?

On 9 January 2017 at 01:05, Stefan Schreiber <st...@mail.telepac.pt> wrote:

> Augustine Leudar wrote:
>
> <> modern binaural recordings I've heard on speakers did not give excellent
>> results they gave terrible results, aside from the fact the transfer
>> functions are messed up by room reflections and cross talk
>>
>
> Fair enough. But it seems that opinions about this seem to be vastly
> different. (The quality of binaural recordings represented via loudspeakers
> is judged to be about between "terrible" and "excellent", depending on
> listener....)
>
> it doesn't even
>> work perfectly on headphones due to differences in individual hrtfs.
>>
>>
> No, quite obviously not "perfectly".  Listening results will depend a lot
> on the hrtf mismatch between dummy head and (individual) listener. And the
> perspective is fixed - you can't rotate some dummy  head recording!
>
> Transaural is supposed to be the the two speaker equivelant of binaural for
>> speakers I know spat were due to release a new version that worked -
>> anyone
>> heard it ?
>>
> Ambiophonics could also  be used - as some already established form of
> X-talk cancellation.
>
> Stefan I am curious what are the advantages you see of
>> ambisonics for 360 audio over say vbap aside from upmix downmix
>> capability ?
>>
>>
> 1. You can't record audio objects. 2. You could reduce computational
> complexity?
>
> You didn't specify any  application details. (So I assume you referred to
> music recordings or VR.)
> Best regards,
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 8 January 2017, Bob Burton <b...@audiorents.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> 1997 "The year had started and finished with Mike (Oldfield)
>>> collaborating
>>> with David Bedford. To finish the year Mike played on the title track on
>>> Bedford's 5th studio LPInstructions for Angels (V2090). Surprisingly, the
>>> track on which Mike appeared was recorded live at Worcester Cathedral on
>>> the Rolling Stones mobile recording studio. This track is quite
>>> breathtaking, with Bedford playing the cathedrals organ and Mike playing
>>> guitar, the natural acoustics of the cathedral make it sound quite
>>> awesome.
>>> Finally, the complete LP was mixed at Mike's Througham studio in BBC
>>> Matrix
>>> H Quad which was also stereo compatible."
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/hRIadP2XMgc
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/
>>> attachments/20170107/65d28b1e/attachment.html>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sursound mailing list
> Sursound@music.vt.edu
> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here,
> edit account or options, view archives and so on.
>



-- 
Augustine Leudar
Artistic Director Magik Door LTD
Company Number : NI635217
Registered 63 Ballycoan rd,
Belfast BT88LL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20170109/d471d95b/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to