> Obviously I would prefer to continue using SeaMonkey, but if the writing is on
> the wall given the limited developer support, I would appreciate some sort of
> migration path to the alternatives available.
We are not there yet. Lets first see how 2.57 works out.
FRG
David H. Durgee wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 3/08/2018 4:58 PM:
Fx 52.9.0 TB 52.9.1
If we change the numbering scheme for 2.57 the still working classic
extensions would probably no longer work and would all need to be
changed.
After 2.57 I am for aligning with TB instead of 3.x but rather unsure
if we will see a later version. source is being trashed more and more
on a daily basis. No chance to pick the good parts anymore or back
out bad ones.
FRG
I hope you and the other Devs keep up your efforts as long as you can,
Frank-Rainer ... for as long as you guys can!!
I likewise hope you can continue to create newer versions of SeaMonkey.
I have a question, however. Should it no longer be possible to continue to
create newer versions given the divergence of FireFox and Thunderbird from
SeaMonkey, what options are available to make FireFox and Thunderbird more
acceptable to SeaMonkey users? Would it be possible to create SeaMonkey
"themes" or their equivalent that would restore them to something more usable?
Obviously I would prefer to continue using SeaMonkey, but if the writing is on
the wall given the limited developer support, I would appreciate some sort of
migration path to the alternatives available.
Dave
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
