I strongly agree with the idea.
It should be noted it is as quick to type
2001:db8::1 as
192.168.1.1 is, but longer than
10.1.1.1 is.
On another hand, the shortest IPv4 address is
1.1.1.1 whereas IPv6 is 1::1.
Alex
Le 06/04/2016 13:53, Andrei Robachevsky a écrit :
Hi,
I recently submitted an I-D
draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-00.txt, mandating use
of IPv6 in examples in RFCs.
I was reading some pretty recent drafts and noticed that authors
continue using IPv4 in their examples. This is probably more convenient,
but is not really forward thinking. Also, the prevalence of IPv6
examples will send a strong message that IPv4 is essentially a legacy
protocol.
I wonder if this WG is interested in progressing this document as a WG
item.
Thanks,
Andrei
Name: draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples
Revision: 00
Title: Mandating use of IPv6 in examples
Document date: 2016-03-21
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 3
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-00.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples/
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ipv6-examples-00
Abstract:
IPv6 is a successor of the legacy IPv4 protocol. This document
mandates use of IPv6 in examples provided in RFCs.
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
