Lee Howard wrote on 08/04/16 19:16: > Thanks to Henrik for this! > Indeed! Technology rules!
> https://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/changelog > > 2.14.01 <https://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/idnits-v2.14.01> > (diff-2.14.01 > <https://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/idnits-v2.14.01.diff.html>) > > > * Added a comment about adding IPv6 examples for documents that uses > addresses from the IPv4 documentation range, without having any > from the IPV6 documentation range > * Changed some references to RFC5735 to instead mention RFC6980. One nit, It'd be better to say: non-RFC6890-compliant IPv4 or IPv6 addresses Andrei > > ( Henrik Levkowetz <[email protected]> 06 Apr 2016 9:57:59 +0100) > > > > Lee > > > On 4/7/16, 6:30 AM, "sunset4 on behalf of Andrei Robachevsky" > <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for your comments and general support. >> >> George, Wes wrote on 06/04/16 16:59: >> [...] >> >>> I think this is very similar to what happens when people >>> use randomly chosen IP addresses or ASNs for examples instead of the >>> proper documentation ones - someone points out that a change needs to be >>> made, and we all move on. That might mean that it doesn't actually need >>> to >>> progress as an RFC, having served its purpose as an I-D to start the >>> discussion. >> >> Agree, still I think a document like this can ensure better consistency >> and raise awareness. >> >> [...] >>> >>> To the content of the document: >>> From a strict RFC2119 normative keyword interpretation, I'm don't think >>> that MUST is the right word here, since you caveat that MUST with >>> "unless..." >> >> Good point. I incorporated the comments and also toned the document down >> a bit. There are indeed legitimate cases where IPv6 examples are not >> applicable. >> >> Here it is: >> >> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-robachevsky-mandating-use-of-ip >> v6-examples-01.txt >> >> Andrei >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sunset4 mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4 > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
