On 4/6/16, 3:59 PM, "sunset4 on behalf of George, Wes" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >A mandate implies that there is some sort of recourse to force it to be >changed if people don't comply, and a question of who enforces it - the >IESG? The RFC editor? IDNITs check? The document shepherd?
IDNITS does currently check whether you are using rfc6890 addresses reserved for documentation. It could certainly be updated to say, ³WARNING: You¹re using IPv4 example addresses, but no IPv6 addresses were found.² I say ³warning² instead of ³error² because until IPv4 is Historic, there are still valid use cases for IPv4-only examples (and especially in the case of translation technologies). Lee _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
