On 4/14/14 3:08 PM, "Ted Lemon" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Apr 14, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Marc Blanchet <[email protected]> >wrote: >> if you mean changing the charter text, then I misunderstood. I thought >>we were saying that by adding a milestone, we were "effectively" >>changing the charter. Which I think not what you wanted to say. You >>want to work on a new text of the charter? > >Milestones are orthogonal to the charter. I could approve a milestone, >and you could work on it, and that would be okay in theory, but this >document needs a clear IETF consensus, so I don't want to do it that way. > >I would replace the part from "Initial work items are:" down to the >bottom with this: > >Current work items are: ... >* BCP recommending that except in unusual cases, new work in the IETF > should either be stack-agnostic, or IPv6-only. I can live with that. It leaves the details of defining the "unusual cases" to the document itself. Lee _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
