Le 2014-04-14 à 15:08, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> a écrit : > On Apr 14, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Marc Blanchet <[email protected]> wrote: >> if you mean changing the charter text, then I misunderstood. I thought we >> were saying that by adding a milestone, we were "effectively" changing the >> charter. Which I think not what you wanted to say. You want to work on a >> new text of the charter? > > Milestones are orthogonal to the charter. I could approve a milestone, and > you could work on it, and that would be okay in theory, but this document > needs a clear IETF consensus, so I don't want to do it that way. > > I would replace the part from "Initial work items are:" down to the bottom > with this:
fine by me. (I would change "stack-agnostic" to "IP version-agnostic" but that is a detail). Do people in the wg disagree with Ted proposal? Marc. > > Current work items are: > > * NAT64 port allocation and address sharing methods involving > scenarios where an IPv6-only node is present (and NAT44, as it > overlaps NAT64 address sharing and port use). This may require a > description of the use of an existing protocol, the development > of extensions to an existing protocol, or the definition of an > entirely new protocol. > > * Gap analysis of IPv4/IPv6 features to facilitate IPv4 sunsetting > > * Provisioning methods to signal a dual-stack host to disable or > depreference the use of IPv4 > > * BCP recommending that except in unusual cases, new work in the IETF > should either be stack-agnostic, or IPv6-only. _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
