On Apr 14, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Marc Blanchet <[email protected]> wrote: > if you mean changing the charter text, then I misunderstood. I thought we > were saying that by adding a milestone, we were "effectively" changing the > charter. Which I think not what you wanted to say. You want to work on a new > text of the charter?
Milestones are orthogonal to the charter. I could approve a milestone, and you could work on it, and that would be okay in theory, but this document needs a clear IETF consensus, so I don't want to do it that way. I would replace the part from "Initial work items are:" down to the bottom with this: Current work items are: * NAT64 port allocation and address sharing methods involving scenarios where an IPv6-only node is present (and NAT44, as it overlaps NAT64 address sharing and port use). This may require a description of the use of an existing protocol, the development of extensions to an existing protocol, or the definition of an entirely new protocol. * Gap analysis of IPv4/IPv6 features to facilitate IPv4 sunsetting * Provisioning methods to signal a dual-stack host to disable or depreference the use of IPv4 * BCP recommending that except in unusual cases, new work in the IETF should either be stack-agnostic, or IPv6-only. _______________________________________________ sunset4 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
