I don't think 8-9 would apply since he was talking about a non-storage area (at 
least I think he was). But 2-0 has that 3'-0" clearance to top of storage as 
well. Is it implied that that a duct or other obstruction would need to follow 
the same clearance distance as the top of storage? I think it would make sense 
to apply it that way, but I couldn't find the language to point to and say 
"see, this it where it tells you."

-Kyle M

From: Ken Wagoner <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 8:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: [External]FM Global obstruction

You don't often get email from [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. 
Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
Kyle,

take a look at FM Data Sheet 8-9, section 2.2.6 (inclusive).  They note a 
requirement for the deflector to have either a 3'-0" clearance between the top 
of the storage, or 5'-0" is the sprinkler is an extended coverage model.

Also, there's some pretty good information in data sheet 2-0 regarding 
obstructions, both in non-storage and storage applications.

sincerely,
Ken Wagoner, SET
Parsley Consulting
3002 Younger Drive
Harrisonville, Missouri 64701-2235
Phone: (760) 745-6181
Visit the 
website<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.parsleyconsulting.com%2f&c=E,1,Y5zKJKPEh1mBEBqSR-VE9cUKl5y-eyP8BpvmE_5j9ZqW2eJbNphYzrCMBZ-2YuX6d-RRkHI4gQ1FV-cvOeCfRC58uZS9NiToZv2mx7909oCqLvCW_n5hDHeK&typo=1>
Please note new street address


On 4/3/2025 10:21 AM, Kyle.Montgomery wrote:
I can't believe it was FM's intention to allow, say, a 47" duct to be located 
directly below the sprinkler and within only a few inches of the deflector. But 
I am having a hard time finding where something is written to refute that.

If it was NFPA 13, I think we'd be saying that it needs to be a minimum of 18" 
below the deflector before we apply that allowance to allow the pattern to 
develop.

Kyle Montgomery
 [cid:[email protected]]
Pre-Construction Manager
Aero Automatic Sprinkler Co.
21605 N. Central Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Direct: 623.580.7820
Cell: 602.763.4736
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



From: Ed van Riel <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2025 12:07 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [External][Sprinklerforum] FM Global obstruction

You don't often get email from 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Learn why this is 
important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
Here below is a passage from FM 2.0 (2021-10) non-storage.
(2.5.2.5.4.1 Any object up to 4 ft (1.2 m) wide, as measured in the object's 
least dimension and in a plane
that is parallel to the floor, does not qualify as an obstruction to the 
sprinkler's discharge pattern.)

Is anything up to 4ft. wide no obstruction? no matter what the vertical 
distance from the deflector (or themal element) is?
Or do we have to respect the clearance of 3 ft (0.9 m)?






_________________________________________________________

SprinklerForum mailing list:

https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org

To unsubscribe send an email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to