I wouldn’t think one is sufficient. Any motion due to pressure fluctuations 
could create a problem.   
  

  
That being said, I would sit across the street in a lawn chair with a couple of 
beers and watch the 200 psi test.   
  
  
  
    
  

  
  
>   
> On Jan 5, 2022 at 9:33 AM,  <Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum 
> (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
>   
>   
>   
>  I do not believe one is sufficient. I recall a project where the 
> specification limited the maximum number of exposed threads to 2 or 3. I'd 
> have to do some research to find the product/installation standard that was 
> referenced. Kevin Hall, M.Eng., P.E., ET, CWBSP, PMSFPE Coordinator, 
> Engineering and Technical Services American Fire Sprinkler Association  
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])   214-349-5971 
> (tel:214-349-5971)  On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:16 AM Dan Arbel via 
> Sprinklerforum  <   [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:  >  Dear Forum 
> Members  >   >  I have a case where 1.25" NPT pipe nipple was connected to 
> 1.25" BSP (as  >  per British standard) pipe.  >   >  Sprinkler System in 
> interstitial space.  >   >  There was only 2 threads engagement.  >   >  
> After about 15 years somebody touched the a pipe and the connection  >  
> disengaged.  >   >  I would appreciated the members opinion on the allegation 
> that even one  >  thread engagement is sufficient providing sufficient 
> strength.  >   >  Dan Arbel  >  Dan Arbel Risk Engineering Ltd  >  Mail:  
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])   >  WEB SITE:  
> www.riskmanage.com (http://www.riskmanage.com)   >  Mobile:  +972-52-6611337 
> (tel:+972-52-6611337)   >  Tel:  +972-4-8243337 (tel:+972-4-8243337)   >  
> _______________________________________________  >  Sprinklerforum mailing 
> list  >   [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])   >   >   
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org  
>  >  _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing 
> list  [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])   
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org  
>  
>
>   
  
  
     
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to