Bill I looked back at the handbook and the standard to make sure I understood the intent. I'm not attempting to split the atom, however I note that the 2' projection described in your post should include the phrase "greater than 2 ft" as identified in §8.17.7.5.  If the projection were exactly 2' wide, and combustibles were stored underneath, sprinklers are not required to be installed underneath such an exterior projection.
*Ken Wagoner, SET*
*Parsley Consulting
500 West Mechanic Street
Harrisonville, Missouri 64701-2235*
*Phone: (760) 745-6181 *
*Visit the website <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.parsleyconsulting.com%2f&c=E,1,Y5zKJKPEh1mBEBqSR-VE9cUKl5y-eyP8BpvmE_5j9ZqW2eJbNphYzrCMBZ-2YuX6d-RRkHI4gQ1FV-cvOeCfRC58uZS9NiToZv2mx7909oCqLvCW_n5hDHeK&typo=1>* On 10/6/2021 9:34 AM, Jones, William - Fire Plans Examiner/Inspector via Sprinklerforum wrote:
The 2016 NFPA 13 handbook states that canopies less than 4' are not required to 
have sprinklers, regardless of construction type, unless combustibles are 
stored under them.  Projections 2' or more require sprinklers, regardless of 
construction type, if there are combustibles stored below it.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2021 6:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Skyler Bilbo <[email protected]>; James Crawford 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: NFPA #13 (2013) Exterior Projections 8.15.7

I think you are correct for your described situation: you have a noncombustible 
overhang, under 4 ft, with no storage underneath, then no sprinklers is OK.

It sure seems to me like we don't have to install sprinklers under
*combustible* overhangs 4 ft or less as long as there is no storage underneath. 
It doesn't say this explicitly (it just doesn't require sprinklers there, it 
doesn't specifically omit them), so maybe there is a reason for that?


-Skyler


On Tue, Oct 5, 2021, 6:40 PM James Crawford via Sprinklerforum < 
[email protected]> wrote:

We have been discussing exterior projections in the office and with an
AHJ on when sprinklers are required.

Section 8.15.7.1 Unless the requirements of 8.15.7.2, 8.15.7.3. or
8.15.7.3 are met, sprinklers shall be installed under exterior
projections exceeding 4'-0" in width.

Section 8.15.7.5 Sprinklers shall be installed under exterior
projections greater than 2'-0" wide over areas where combustibles are stored.

Canopy is less than 4'-0" in width, No vehicle storage,
non-combustible construction, not a corridor, so all items are met for
8.15.7.1, no sprinklers required.

But 8.15.7.5 seems to requires them because the canopy is over 2'-0"

Normally we worked on the assumption less than 4'-0" and
non-combustible, no storage, no sprinklers required and the 2'-0" was
for combustible construction, over 2'-0" you required sprotection.

What are we missing

Thank You

James Crawford
Phaser Fire Protection Ltd.
Phone 604-888-0318
Cel: 604-790-0938
Email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Web:
www.phaserfire.ca<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.phaserfire.ca
__;!!Lat9tvSZzw!2966oXlOCeWJFkrAPJWVub7_nW9I5W6w71dVLCjboahCHUcxkKS9R2
anwqvBWC0VLYZx$ >

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]

https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cg
i/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!Lat9tvSZzw!2966oXlOCeWJFkrAPJWV
ub7_nW9I5W6w71dVLCjboahCHUcxkKS9R2anwqvBWKummc6-$

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!Lat9tvSZzw!2966oXlOCeWJFkrAPJWVub7_nW9I5W6w71dVLCjboahCHUcxkKS9R2anwqvBWKummc6-$
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
  • NFPA #13... James Crawford via Sprinklerforum
    • Re:... Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum
      • ... Jones, William - Fire Plans Examiner/Inspector via Sprinklerforum
        • ... Ken Wagoner via Sprinklerforum
          • ... Jones, William - Fire Plans Examiner/Inspector via Sprinklerforum
    • RE:... Mike Morey via Sprinklerforum

Reply via email to