Hi Yingzhen & WG，
I support the adoption of this draft.
It introduces a simplified protection mechanism for the SRv6 egress node，and
ZTE has completed the prototype verification of
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05.
Best Regards，
Ran
Original
From: YingzhenQu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com>
To: RTGWG <rt...@ietf.org>;spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>;rtgwg-chairs
<rtgwg-cha...@ietf.org>;draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection
<draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protect...@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年02月10日 03:31
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call -
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection (02/09/24 - 02/24/24)
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
Hi, This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05 - SRv6 Egress Protection
in Multi-homed scenario (ietf.org) Please review the document and indicate your
support or objections by Feb 24th, 2024.Please note that there is an existing
WG document:draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16 - SRv6 Path Egress
Protection Which proposes fast protections for the egress node and link of an
SRv6 path through extending IGP and using Mirror SID. As you discuss adopting
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection, please also consider:Do we
need these different solutions?
Technical merits and drawbacks of each solution
If there is any implementation of the proposals, please voice it.
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR
that applies to the draft.Also copying SPRING WG.Thanks, Yingzhen (RTGWG
Co-chair)
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
