Hi, You mentioned "verified solution", are you aware of any implementation or deployment?
Thanks, Yingzhen On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:35 AM Feng Yang <yangf...@chinamobile.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Support. > > This is a simple, fast, verified solution for tail end protection. > 在 2024-02-10 03:30, Yingzhen Qu 写道: > > Hi, > > This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following > draft:draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection-05 - SRv6 Egress > Protection in Multi-homed scenario (ietf.org) > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection/> > > Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by Feb > 24th, 2024. > > Please note that there is an existing WG > document:draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16 - SRv6 Path Egress > Protection > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection/> > Which proposes fast protections for the egress node and link of an SRv6 path > through extending IGP and using Mirror SID. As you discuss adopting > draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection, please also consider: > > > - Do we need these different solutions? > - Technical merits and drawbacks of each solution > - If there is any implementation of the proposals, please voice it. > > Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any > IPR that applies to the draft. > > Also copying SPRING WG. > > Thanks, > Yingzhen (RTGWG Co-chair) > > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing listspring@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > > -- > BR, > Feng Yang （杨锋） > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
