I agree with the resolution for all issues and can all be closed. Thank you
Gyan On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:26 AM Gyan Mishra <hayabusa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree the resolution is sufficient and issue #3 can be closed. > > Thank you > > Gyan > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 11:00 AM Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > >> Issue #3 in the datatracker reads >> >> The definition for the SegmentsLeft field of the SRH as currently stated >> in [RFC8754][RFC8200] no longer holds true in the presence of C-SIDs. This >> definition needs to be updated to still hold true in the presence of C-SIDs. >> >> The response from the document editors reads: >> >> Segments Left: Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4. Specifically, for the >> SRH, the number of unprocessed 128-bit entries in the Segment List. >> >> >> Please indicate to the list whether you consider this resolution >> sufficient to close the issue, or have further concerns that should be >> addressed. If you have concerns, clarity about them is appreciated. This >> call is open for two weeks, through August 22. >> _______________________________________________ >> spring mailing list >> spring@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >> > -- > > <http://www.verizon.com/> > > *Gyan Mishra* > > *Network Solutions A**rchitect * > > *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>* > > > > *M 301 502-1347* > > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring