I agree with the resolution for all issues and can all be closed.

Thank you

Gyan

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:26 AM Gyan Mishra <hayabusa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree the resolution is sufficient and issue #3 can be closed.
>
> Thank you
>
> Gyan
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 11:00 AM Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>
>> Issue #3 in the datatracker reads
>>
>> The definition for the SegmentsLeft field of the SRH as currently stated
>> in [RFC8754][RFC8200] no longer holds true in the presence of C-SIDs. This
>> definition needs to be updated to still hold true in the presence of C-SIDs.
>>
>> The response from the document editors reads:
>>
>> Segments Left: Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4. Specifically, for the
>> SRH, the number of unprocessed 128-bit entries in the Segment List.
>>
>>
>> Please indicate to the list whether you consider this resolution
>> sufficient to close the issue, or have further concerns that should be
>> addressed.  If you have concerns, clarity about them is appreciated. This
>> call is open for two weeks, through August 22.
>> _______________________________________________
>> spring mailing list
>> spring@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>>
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>*
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
> --

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to