Hi, The resolution makes sense, so I believe the proposed resolution is sufficient to close the issue.
Thanks, Dan From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 10:59 AM To: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org> Subject: [EXT][spring] Confimring resolution of issue #3 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/ Issue #3 in the datatracker reads The definition for the SegmentsLeft field of the SRH as currently stated in [RFC8754][RFC8200] no longer holds true in the presence of C-SIDs. This definition needs to be updated to still hold true in the presence of C-SIDs. The response from the document editors reads: Segments Left: Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4. Specifically, for the SRH, the number of unprocessed 128-bit entries in the Segment List. Please indicate to the list whether you consider this resolution sufficient to close the issue, or have further concerns that should be addressed. If you have concerns, clarity about them is appreciated. This call is open for two weeks, through August 22.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
