I agree the resolution is sufficient and issue #3 can be closed. Thank you
Gyan On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 11:00 AM Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > Issue #3 in the datatracker reads > > The definition for the SegmentsLeft field of the SRH as currently stated > in [RFC8754][RFC8200] no longer holds true in the presence of C-SIDs. This > definition needs to be updated to still hold true in the presence of C-SIDs. > > The response from the document editors reads: > > Segments Left: Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4. Specifically, for the > SRH, the number of unprocessed 128-bit entries in the Segment List. > > > Please indicate to the list whether you consider this resolution > sufficient to close the issue, or have further concerns that should be > addressed. If you have concerns, clarity about them is appreciated. This > call is open for two weeks, through August 22. > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
