Hi Wim, > WH> We are either all encapsulating or not, but in essence the point is that > the difference is you put the sids in the extension header versus next > header. Lets leave it like this. All in all what I am saying is RFC8663 > allows you to do what you intend with CRH.
No, I can't. You're not reading what i wrote. I want packet steering without encapsulation: a plain IPv6 pakket with a RH and plain UDP, TCP etc in the payload. Please stop telling me that RFC8663 is the answer, because it's not. Sander _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
