Sander, inline
On 26/05/2020, 19:03, "Sander Steffann" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Wim,
> WH> Sander RFC8663 is supported in linux and various implementations.
You can do the encap in the same way as you have done with CRH w/o a router
doing the encap.
You misunderstand. I don't want any encap overhead, I just want IPv6
packets...
WH> Why would it matter if I add the sids in an Extension Header, versus
through a Next header. As long as we achieve the same goal why would you care?
Cheers,
Sander
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
