Sander,
On 26/05/2020, 19:40, "Sander Steffann" <san...@steffann.nl> wrote:
Hi Wim,
> Wh> Nothing is put in the payload when using RFC8663. The SID list is put
in a next header field as per RFC 4023, whereas in CRH you put them in an EH,
but the payload is intact. I have not done the exact calculation on the wire,
but they are almost the same in size wrt overhead when you compare 32bit.
But you're still encapsulating. Otherwise you're not making any sense to
me...
WH> We are either all encapsulating or not, but in essence the point is that
the difference is you put the sids in the extension header versus next header.
Lets leave it like this. All in all what I am saying is RFC8663 allows you to
do what you intend with CRH.
.
Sander
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
