Hi Ron,
> It would be fair to say that these operators "wish to deploy IPv6 Traffic > Engineering". Some of these operators don't care about SR. Some are > actively averse to SRv6. All they want is a Routing header. > How about all of the above minus need for new routing header and zero overhead (except one IPv6 encapsulation) with far better scaling properties and no dependency on number of transit hops ? Hint: Reference based Routing RbR Do you think that if someone ships RbR there would be even single advantage to use CRH ? Thank you, R.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
