[long list of individual email addresses trimmed from cc, mailing lists left]
Peter, On May 29, 2020, at 5:11 AM, Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:ppsenak=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: if CRH-SIDs are of local significance how is the loose source routing going to be supported? By having the locally-significant CRH identifier (I’ve lost track of the nom du jour :-) map in the CRH-FIB to a remote address (“segment endpoint”), toward which the packet is forwarded along the least-cost path. This is explicit in section 4: o Forward the packet to the next-hop along the least-cost path to the next segment endpoint. Regards, —John
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
