On 27/2/20 04:51, Dirk Steinberg wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 1:45 AM Fernando Gont <fg...@si6networks.com
<mailto:fg...@si6networks.com>> wrote:
Hello, Eric,
On 26/2/20 20:18, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
> Writing this without any hat,
>
> Please note that on the logical side, it still have to be
"proven" that this idea is strictly forbidden by RFC 8200.
Here's the proof part:
1) Isn't IPv6 end to end?
2) How do core components of IPv6, such as AH and PMTUD work in the
present of intermediate nodes that can add and/or remove arbitrary
extension headers?
It should be clear from the above that EH insertion/deletion is
forbidden.
As I already explained to you this is not true.
The wording of RFC8200 clearly allows this.
The node addresses by the DA of the packet can do this.
FWIW, this is not even true for PSP.
Brian raised this so many times already... but it looks like the
procedure is busted anyway. You claim IPv6 behavior that never existed,
you ignore objections, and a dozen of folks post "+1" as if that meant
the issues raised had been addressed.
I have asked numerous times the same questions I asked above, and they
have never been answered -- because we all know they make the rest obvious.
But go ahead. I'll appeal or escalate if necessary.
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
