On 26 Feb 2020, at 19:16, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > > I would suggest that people read RFC 7282 - "On Consensus and Humming > in the IETF", especially Sections 3 & 6 (it is a short document, you > should read the whole thing, but pay special attention to these > sections). > > It doesn't really matter how many people say +1 for moving it forwards > -- if there are valid technical objections these have to be dealt with > - and I think that the relationship with RFC8200 falling into this > category... > > W >
+1 for not violating RFC8200 Mike >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 2:01 PM John Leddy <j...@leddy.net> wrote: >> >> +1 in support of moving the document forward. >> >> John Leddy >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:22 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Zafar, >>> >>>> On Feb 26, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Zafar Ali (zali) >>>> <zali=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1, >>>> >>>> Just to add, in the spirit of IETF https://www.ietf.org/how/runningcode/ … >>>> implementation, commercial deployment and Inter-op status has been >>>> documented in >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status/ >>> >>> I think the proper question is there a consensus to advance this document. >>> >>> There seems to be questions about its relationship with RFC8200. I am not >>> seeing this as being resolved. >>> >>> Bob >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >>> i...@ietf.org >>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >> i...@ietf.org >> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > i...@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
