+1 in support of moving the document forward. John Leddy
Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:22 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Zafar, > >> On Feb 26, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Zafar Ali (zali) >> <zali=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> +1, >> >> Just to add, in the spirit of IETF https://www.ietf.org/how/runningcode/ … >> implementation, commercial deployment and Inter-op status has been >> documented in >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status/ > > I think the proper question is there a consensus to advance this document. > > There seems to be questions about its relationship with RFC8200. I am not > seeing this as being resolved. > > Bob > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > i...@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
