At Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:45:14 -0300, Fernando Gont <ferna...@gont.com.ar> wrote:
> So... is the plan to ship a document that violates RFC8200? Please forgive me asking some clarification question that seems to be obvious for others: which part of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-10 violates RFC8200? From a quick read of it, Section 4.16 seems to describe the removal of an extension header from an IPv6 packet at a forwarding node. Is that the one referenced as a violation? Or is it something else, or are there others in addition to 4.16? -- JINMEI, Tatuya _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
