On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 10:28:53AM -0500, Hilmar Lapp wrote: > >I think it’s great that people are speaking up here with their >thoughts on this matter, even if they rehash arguments that have been >discussed ad nauseam earlier. > >I think it’s also reasonable to expect that those arguments won’t be >entertained again by everyone else at the same depth that they have >been previously, lest a process many here (including myself) are >keenly interested in seeing result in change before the next round of >elections be derailed into an infinite rehash of arguments and >counterpoints. > >Since my viewpoint on this doesn’t seem to be one that has been >expressed as vociferously here yet, I’ll say that I agree quite >strongly with both Ian’s voting system proposal, as well as his >reasons for why we should adopt it.
+1. All the data I've seen personally tells me that STV is a good option for our kind of setup. I'm not a total voting geek, but this looks fine to me. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I... _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
