On 08/20/2016 06:02 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Not exactly. I am saying that people would contribute more if:1. The knowledge required to contribute was less costly to learn, or already more widespread 2. There was no need to setup a rare system to validate a suggested solution before submitting it. 3. It could be determined before proposing a change whether the same proposition is already waiting processing. 4. It could be determined before proposing a change whether the same proposition was already made and rejected. 5. Proposing a change was less costly, indeed. 6. It was possible to receive a confirmation that a change was queued when proposing it.
Exactly. The barrier to contribution should be as close to sea level as possible. I am fully capable of firing up the SPI infrastructure on a test instance, am I going to? No. I have better things to do.
Now, if you give me the ability to log into the website, write a blog or an article or update a web page with more relevant info that can be queued for review and then published? Yes, I would happily do that.
JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
